Nel silenzio stampa, e’ Marco Minniti, sottosegretario alla
Presidenza del Consiglio con delega ai servizi segreti, a lanciare l’allarme il
2 maggio: abbiamo sei mesi per salvare la Libia, evitando così una nuova
Somalia davanti alla porta di casa, “si deve capire che quella libica è una
partita strategica decisiva per la sicurezza del Mediterraneo e dell’Europa”
avverte il senatore Pd. Intervistato da Claudio Gatti del Sole24Ore, Minniti si
spoglia della solita riservatezza, occligata vista la posizione ricoperta, e si
dichiara “molto preoccupato” per quello che potrebbe succedere nei pressi di
Tripoli, “ogni mattina inizio la mia giornata pensando alla Libia” si legge
nell’intervista.
Mentre tutte le energie diplomatiche sono concentrate, d’altronde non
potrebbe essere altrimenti vista l’escalation degli ultimi tempi, sulla
questione ucraina; nel disinteresse dei nostri alleati, in Libia si sta
giocando la partita geopolitica più importante per il nostro paese e per
l’Europa intera: una guerra civile in Ucraina, insieme al collasso del sistema
produttivo del petrolio e del gas libico, potrebbe solo accentuare una
possibile drammatica crisi per il nostro paese. La Libia oltre a essere il
cuore dei nostri interessi energetici e anche il campo di un’altra importante
partita geopolitica, quella contro il movimento jihadista; a preoccupare
Minniti anche la spinta demografica extracomunitaria che soprattutto attraverso
la Libia si muove verso le coste italiane – il 94% dell’immigrazione
clandestina che si riversa in Italia passa dalla Libia – con costi umani
altissimi.
“Lo stallo politico-istituzionale e quello dell’industria energetica
stanno spingendo il Paese verso uno stato di frantumazione politica e sociale”
– riferisce Minniti – alludendo al fatto che, l’offensiva delle milizie
islamiche libiche, sta determinando la “caduta libera” della produzione
giornaliera del petrolio (meno di un sesto di quella prevista); tra gas e
greggio: dai 4 miliardi di euro al mese di ricavi energetici del primo semestre
2013, si è scesi ai 190/200 milioni di oggi.
Quello che resta dello Stato libico – le dimissioni del
premier Al-Thani devono aver rappresentato una “sveglia” – sta
finendo i fondi necessari a sostenere una società “storicamente molto
assisitita” e questo sta mettendo sempre più a repentaglio la tenuta
territoriale, rafforzando le tradizionali spinte separatiste della Cirenaica,
oltre a quelle dei numerosi clan, delle milizie e delle tribù presenti in
Libia, per cui “occorre assolutamente evitare che la situazione finisca fuori
controllo, altrimenti scatterà un gigantesco effetto domino su tutti e tre
fronti – quello energetico, quello della sicurezza dello Stato e quello
dell’immigrazione”.
Esclude un intervento di “peace enforcing”; Minniti, piuttosto, si
dichiara favorevole a un intervento della comunità internazionale che permetta
all’Italia di giocare un ruolo importante “nominando un inviato di altissimo
rango che riconosca le istanze federaliste della Cirenaica e che possa avviare
un processo di riconciliazione nazionale”; una volta fatto questo, Italia ed
Europa, potranno guidare la riattivazione del settore energetico e
l’assorbimento delle milizie nelle forze di sicurezza nazionale in modo da
innescare una spirale virtuosa che, consentendogli di entrare in possesso delle
risorse necessarie, permetterà alle autorità centrali del paese di condurre
felicemente l’integrazione sociale e militare.
Can Libyan Muslim Brotherhood thrive in the turbulent
politics of post-Qaddafi Libya?
As the
brass band struck the opening notes of the national anthem, the crowd gathered
for Libya's Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Justice and Construction Party (JCP)
congress rose to their feet. Television cameras scanned the strikingly diverse
crowd of more than 500 people that packed the conference hall at a luxury
Tripoli hotel. Everyone from turbaned Tuareg from Libya's southern belt to
Amazigh from the western mountains was in attendance. JCP members showed off
their new insignia -- two hands joined together in the party colors of blue and
yellow -- along with their motto, written in Arabic and Amazigh: "Together
we strengthen democracy and consensus."
Prominent
non-Islamist figures were there, mixing openly with their Brotherhood rivals.
Giuma Atigha, a liberal-leaning lawyer and former vice president of Libya's
national congress, sat in the front row between JCP chief Mohammed Sawan and
Abdelhakim Belhadj, former leader of the defunct Libyan Islamic Fighting Group
and now head of the Watan political party. A speaker welcomed members of the
JCP's main opponent in congress, the more liberal National Forces Alliance,
before giving the podium to the leader of the small, non-Islamist Taghyeer
("Change") party.
The theme
of the day was inclusivity. Speakers harped on the need to build national
consensus in a country sliding deeper into polarization along ideological,
regional, and tribal lines. One speaker cited Rachid Ghannouchi, leader of
Tunisia's Islamist Ennahda party, on placing the national interest over party
politics. Mentions of the importance of Libya remaining on the democratic path
were met with applause and religious exhortations. Speakers paid tribute to
Hassan al-Droui, a deputy industry minister and JCP member shot dead in his
hometown of Sirte in January in what was the first assassination of a member of
Libya's transitional government.
"We
are moving in the right direction despite the difficulties," Sawan told
the crowd.
The
congress came at a critical juncture for a party bruised, like other political
groupings here, by almost two years of turbulent experimentation with
democracy. The partisan bickering that has paralyzed Libya's fledgling
legislature, where all factions are aligned with particular militias, has
soured the public mood so much that many here now argue the country would be
better off without political parties.
Libya's
militias continue to haunt its politics. Prime Minister Ali Zeidan, a vehement
critic of the Muslim Brotherhood, was ousted in March after failing to rein in
militias blockading eastern oil ports. His successor, interim Prime Minister
Abdullah al-Thinni, expressed his eagerness to quit the post as soon as a
replacement is found after he and his family were attacked by gunmen. Just this
week, a congress vote to choose a new prime minister had to be postponed after
militiamen from Benghazi turned up, prompting gunfire outside.
"We
believe we made mistakes, all of us, because politics is new to us," one
senior JCP apparatchik admitted to me. "Now we have to see what lessons we
have learned and go from there."
None of
Libya's political neophytes has emerged from the chaos unscathed. However, the
JCP appears to have largely escaped the infighting that has all but atomized
the National Forces Alliance, which beat the JCP with 39 seats to 17 in the
2012 general elections but is now just a shadow of its former self after a law
passed last year banned those who had worked for the Qaddafi regime from
political office, affecting its leaders and some congress members. Even the
JCP's critics acknowledged that last week's slickly organized congress,
attended by delegates elected from 29 nationwide branches, was a testament to
the strength of its party machine.
The
formidable internal organization of Libya's Muslim Brotherhood affiliate,
however, has not translated into high levels of public support. In fact, the
Brotherhood connection appears to limit the JCP's appeal: Muammar al-Qaddafi's
long suppression and demonization of the movement has left many Libyans
skeptical of it, while the Brotherhood's setbacks across the Middle East have
emboldened Libyan anti-Brotherhood activists.
The JCP
was launched in March 2012, after the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood decided to
formally enter politics by joining with others "of a similar
mindset." The party is structurally independent from the Brotherhood -- a
sign of the movement's uncertainty about its standing in Libya after decades of
Qaddafi's propaganda, which regularly painted the Brothers as "wayward
dogs" and "terrorists." The former regime's ruthless repression
meant that, for much of Libyan Brotherhood's lifetime, it was predominantly a
movement in exile, Its leader, a mild-mannered accountant named Bashir Kupti,
spent decades living in Los Angeles before returning to Libya during the 2011
revolution.
The goal
was to present a more diverse -- and therefore more palatable -- front to
potential voters. The JCP stresses that it is independent and open to everyone
and that Brotherhood cadres make up only a fraction of its some 10,000
registered members. However, the party has largely failed to dispel the
widespread perception that it serves as the Brotherhood's political arm. This
is not helped by the fact the JCP's upper ranks are Brotherhood-heavy: Sawan, a
former head of the Brotherhood's shura council who spent years in Gaddafi's
jails, was re-elected leader at last week's party congress.
The
association with the Brotherhood has proved a burden in a country where many
conflate Islamists who engage with the political process with radicals who
denounce democracy altogether. It is not uncommon to hear anti-Islamist Libyans
claim that the Brotherhood is working in league with al Qaeda or Ansar
al-Sharia, a hard-line militia that was designated a terrorist organization by
the U.S. State Department in January.
The
notion that the Brotherhood is trying to seize control of Libya is also part of
the narrative put forward by both federalists in the east and anti-Islamist
militias who threatened parliament in February, prompting the intervention of
the U.N. envoy to Libya.
"It's
an exaggeration," admits one prominent eastern federalist. "But it
works in our favor because Libyans in general are suspicious of the Brotherhood
to begin with."
At times,
the anti-Brotherhood rhetoric enters the realm of the farcical. A panelist on
one TV show claimed a well-known Libyan Islamist had been seen meeting Egyptian
Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna -- who was assassinated in Cairo in
1949 -- in a Doha hotel lobby. A guest on another show insisted Qaddafi himself
had been a member of the Brotherhood.
Such
clearly ridiculous allegations are easy to laugh off, say JCP members, but
others have clearly poisoned the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood's reputation.
"We
have experienced a tough campaign against us," senior JCP figure Mohammed
Harizi told the party congress.
The
campaign against the JCP has, at times, spilled over into violence. Following
the killing last July of Benghazi activist Abdulsalam al-Mesmari -- a vocal
critic of the Brotherhood and Islamists more generally -- angry mobs ransacked
and burned the JCP headquarters in Tripoli and Benghazi. One fiercely
anti-Islamist TV channel ran footage of Mesmari talking about the Brotherhood
on a loop, with an accompanying ticker that read: "Who killed
Abdulsalam?" The mood got so ugly that party members feared for the life
of their leader, Sawan.
The July
2013 military overthrow of Egypt's first democratically elected president,
Mohamed Morsi, a Brotherhood member, also had an impact on Libya that is still
being felt today. Some within the country's hollowed-out military, along with
anti-Islamist activists and militias, make no secret of their wish to see a similar
scenario unfold in Libya. Islamists, meanwhile, are convinced such plots are
afoot.
"People
who are against the Brotherhood here got a psychological boost because of what
happened in Egypt," says Alamin Belhaj, a senior JCP figure and former
head of the Libyan Brotherhood's shura council. "It had a very negative
effect on us. The strategy of blaming everything on the Brotherhood has been
very successful. 'Ikhwani' [Brotherhood] became a catchall term of abuse."
The
Libyan Muslim Brotherhood has also faced criticism -- and even threats -- from
within the country's wider Islamist firmament. Last year, Salafists in Tripoli
publicly burned copies of the works of Banna and Brotherhood ideologue Sayyid
Qutb. Others have accused the Brotherhood of compromising its principles to
gain influence in the political game. Extremists in the restive city of Derna have
targeted the Muslim Brotherhood and the JCP, bombing their offices and cars. An
Islamist militia commander in eastern Libya recently declared that the
Brotherhood had become a "burden on the country and on the Islamic
movement itself."
All this
has taken its toll on the Libyan Brotherhood and prompted no small amount of
soul-searching among its members. The movement is still trying to put down
roots in Libyan society, as its Egyptian counterpart did for decades, including
registering as a nongovernmental organization in 2012.
Some
close to the Brotherhood argue that the movement should withdraw from politics
entirely for a couple of years, focusing instead on social and charitable
programs that might help mend its battered reputation. But others counter that
removing itself from Libya's nascent political scene -- even if only
temporarily -- could spell disaster for the organization. As this debate plays
out, the JCP remains undecided on how it will approach elections for a new
house of representatives, due to take place this year.
"Staying
in the political game means we will get better at it," says one member of
the Brotherhood's shura council. "And by staying we will make sure our
political enemies don't keep us out. Libya needs a diverse political spectrum
to reflect its diverse society. We believe the Islamist perspective is best
represented by the Brotherhood and not the extremists who give a distorted
picture."
END
No comments:
Post a Comment