How Libya without the "dictator" Gaddafi? According to all points of view in Libya's post-Colonel you live much worse than in the past and above all peace seems far away with a country divided between armed gangs and at least three powers: that of Tobruk, to Tripoli and that Muslim gangs.
Strange but after Gaddafi fate, was not Libyans life supposed to be rosy and democratic?
Exactly four years ago, Muammar Gaddafi was lynched near Sirte by a band of "rebels", journalists and media tried to convince us ''rebels'' were good guys in blue jeans, thirsty for freedom and democracy helped by West to eliminate the evil tyrant.
Four years by the physical elimination of Colonel, friend of Mandela, however, the situation in Libya worsened rather than improved and there is no trace of democracy. But no one has any intention of doing mea culpa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mea_culpa, nobody's going to apologize for what has been decided in Libya, or to destroy overnight a legitimate government to destroy the country and basically unleash chaos.
Clearly, the chaos is useful for those who planned to get their hands on oil fields and the wealth of the country, and that is exactly what was done. In a country divided among four different powers, Tripoli, Tobruk, militias and Isis, the only ones who show themselves willing to fight Islamic extremists are members of Tobruk Parliament, they are also the only ones with an embargo by the West that materially impossible to combat the Isis.
Libya, prepared by the EU € 100 million for a government of national unity.
About prospects for peace with UN and EU which would like to support the "Government of National Unity" for the first 2 months of its life, but in the meantime West created a failed state, ideal for Isis appetites which West just provoked. West spread similar scenario to all the countries victims of West designs: Libya, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Will it be a simple case? We think not; while the West offers good conscience trying to foster peace, there is no doubt that Islamic terrorists grow uncertain. And above all, it is Europe that has essentially wanted this scenario for Libya, because now would want to help? Gaddafi had made it clear that the only alternative to his government would be chaos and terrorism, but probably already knew all and it was exactly what they wanted to achieve by eliminating the Colonel and Libya.
Libya and Syria, "EU is afraid of the truth on the influx of refugees"
In four years of civil war it has emerged as with all its faults Gaddafi had also done a lot of good for his people, and now that Gaddafi has been removed none of the above defects of the North African country has been resolved. Indeed there are now thousands of people armed and out of control as well as an endless influx of refugees, however, also foretold its Colonel.
In short, we were made to believe that we were against Gaddafi as against both dictators and democracy, but four years after that infamous operation we can say that reason to eliminate any Gaddafi certainly was the will to do pretty good for Libya, unless you consider as result the "democracy" which allowed radical jihadists to have citizenship in Libya with even their aspiration to govern the country, which is a little bit what was going to happen before Russian military intervention in Syria.
Evidently it was better to put a tombstone over the claims of Gaddafi for Africa future and his idea to create an African currency in order to overcome the chains of debts to West.
No coincidence perhaps had too much interest in eliminating a man with all his enormous flaws who had the merit of not bending to imperialism. Not surprisingly, the "Gaddafi" uncomfortable was not only so much Berlusconi bunga bunga and parties as the man who loved to talk with old friend Nelson Mandela. In any case, the only thing almost with certainty is that whatever was the reason for West to eliminate him, it certainly was not the desire to help "democracy" in Libya.
How is Libya without the "dictator" Gaddafi? According to all points of Libyans and foreigners views, Libya after Colonel is much worse than in the past and above all peace seems far away with a country divided between armed gangs and at least three powers: Tobruk, Tripoli and Daesh.
Strange but after Gaddafi fate, was not Libyans life supposed to be rosy and democratic?
Exactly four years ago, Muammar Gaddafi was lynched near Sirte by a band of "rebels", journalists and media tried to convince us ''rebels'' were good guys in blue jeans, thirsty for freedom and democracy helped by West to eliminate the evil tyrant.
Four years by the physical elimination of Colonel, friend of Mandela, however, the situation in Libya worsened rather than improved and there is no trace of democracy. But no one has any intention of doing mea culpa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mea_culpa, nobody's going to apologize for what has been decided in Libya, or to destroy overnight a legitimate government to destroy the country and basically unleash chaos.
Clearly, the chaos is useful for those who planned to get their hands on oil fields and the wealth of the country, and that is exactly what was done. In a country divided among four different powers, Tripoli, Tobruk, militias and Isis, the only ones who show themselves willing to fight Islamic extremists are members of Tobruk Parliament, they are also the only ones with an embargo by the West that materially impossible to combat the Isis.
Libya, prepared by the EU € 100 million for a government of national unity.
About prospects for peace with UN and EU which would like to support the "Government of National Unity" for the first 2 months of its life, but in the meantime West created a failed state, ideal for Isis appetites which West just provoked. West spread similar scenario to all the countries victims of West designs: Libya, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Will it be a simple case? We think not; while the West offers good conscience trying to foster peace, there is no doubt that Islamic terrorists grow uncertain. And above all, it is Europe that has essentially wanted this scenario for Libya, because now would want to help? Gaddafi had made it clear that the only alternative to his government would be chaos and terrorism, but probably already knew all and it was exactly what they wanted to achieve by eliminating the Colonel and Libya.
Libya and Syria, "EU is afraid of the truth on the influx of refugees"
In four years of civil war it has emerged as with all its faults Gaddafi had also done a lot of good for his people, and now that Gaddafi has been removed none of the above defects of the North African country has been resolved. Indeed there are now thousands of people armed and out of control as well as an endless influx of refugees, however, also foretold its Colonel.
In short, we were made to believe that we were against Gaddafi as against both dictators and democracy, but four years after that infamous operation we can say that reason to eliminate any Gaddafi certainly was the will to do pretty good for Libya, unless you consider as result the "democracy" which allowed radical jihadists to have citizenship in Libya with even their aspiration to govern the country, which is a little bit what was going to happen before Russian military intervention in Syria.
Evidently it was better to put a tombstone over the claims of Gaddafi for Africa future and his idea to create an African currency in order to overcome the chains of debts to West.
No coincidence perhaps had too much interest in eliminating a man with all his enormous flaws who had the merit of not bending to imperialism. Not surprisingly, the "Gaddafi" uncomfortable was not only so much Berlusconi bunga bunga and parties as the man who loved to talk with old friend Nelson Mandela. In any case, the only thing almost with certainty is that whatever was the reason for West to eliminate him, it certainly was not the desire to help "democracy" in Libya.
How is Libya without the "dictator" Gaddafi? According to all points of Libyans and foreigners views, Libya after Colonel is much worse than in the past and above all peace seems far away with a country divided between armed gangs and at least three powers: Tobruk, Tripoli and Daesh.
No comments:
Post a Comment